
Guides
A qualified intermediary, sometimes called an accommodator, is the independent party that makes a delayed 1031 exchange possible under the safe harbor rules in the Treasury Regulations. Without a qualified intermediary standing between the sale of the relinquished property and the purchase of the replacement property, the taxpayer would be in actual or constructive receipt of the sale proceeds the moment the relinquished property closes, and the exchange would fail before it even begins. The qualified intermediary exists specifically to hold those proceeds outside the taxpayer's control during the gap between the two closings.
The mechanics work through a written exchange agreement signed before the relinquished property closes. That agreement assigns the taxpayer's rights in the sale contract to the qualified intermediary, who then receives the sale proceeds directly from the closing rather than the funds passing through the taxpayer's hands. The qualified intermediary holds those funds, typically in a qualified escrow account or a qualified trust account, until the taxpayer identifies replacement property and directs the intermediary to release funds toward that purchase. The same assignment structure repeats on the replacement property side, with the qualified intermediary taking assignment of the purchase contract so the funds move directly from the intermediary to the closing rather than back through the taxpayer.
The Treasury Regulations disqualify certain people from serving as a taxpayer's qualified intermediary because of the risk of undue influence over the taxpayer's funds. A taxpayer's employee, attorney, accountant, investment banker, broker, or real estate agent who has acted in that capacity for the taxpayer within the two years before the exchange is generally disqualified, along with anyone related to the taxpayer within the meaning of the tax code. This is why exchange professionals typically use a dedicated qualified intermediary company rather than, for example, the closing attorney who also represented the taxpayer on the same transaction.
Unlike some states, Massachusetts does not maintain a state licensing or bonding regime specifically for qualified intermediaries, which places more of the due diligence burden on the taxpayer and the taxpayer's advisors. Before selecting a qualified intermediary for a Boston, MA exchange, it is worth confirming how exchange funds are held, whether the intermediary uses a qualified escrow account with the taxpayer as a named party on the account, whether the funds are commingled with the intermediary's operating accounts or with other clients' exchange funds, and whether the intermediary carries a fidelity bond and errors and omissions insurance. These questions matter because exchange funds sometimes sit with the intermediary for weeks or months, and the qualified intermediary industry, unlike banks or broker-dealers, is not subject to uniform federal prudential regulation.
Beyond holding funds, a qualified intermediary typically prepares the exchange agreement and assignment documents, coordinates with the closing attorney or title company on both legs of the transaction, receives the taxpayer's written identification notice within the forty-five-day period, and disburses funds according to the taxpayer's written direction once replacement property is under contract. In a reverse exchange or an improvement exchange, the role expands further, since an affiliated exchange accommodation titleholder may hold title to a property directly during the exchange period under the safe harbor established in Revenue Procedure 2000-37. Coordinating closely with the qualified intermediary from the moment the relinquished property is listed, rather than waiting until days before closing, generally produces a smoother handoff of documents and funds throughout the exchange.
The distinction between a qualified escrow account and a qualified trust account is more than technical vocabulary. A qualified escrow account is generally a bank or similar depository account where the escrow holder, the qualified intermediary, is not treated as having unrestricted use of the funds, while a qualified trust account is a similar arrangement organized under a trust instrument rather than a straightforward escrow agreement. Both structures are designed to satisfy the same underlying requirement in the Treasury Regulations, sometimes referred to informally by its regulatory citation as the g(6) restrictions, which limit the taxpayer's right to receive, pledge, borrow against, or otherwise obtain the benefits of the exchange funds before the earlier of the identification period lapsing without a valid identification, or the taxpayer actually receiving all of the replacement property to which they are entitled. A qualified intermediary that allows a taxpayer any of those rights before the appropriate triggering event has failed to satisfy the safe harbor, regardless of what the account is labeled, which is why the specific language of the exchange agreement matters more than the marketing description of the account type.
Once a qualified intermediary is engaged, the coordination work does not stop at signing the exchange agreement. Many of the specific tasks a qualified intermediary or their affiliated escrow provider performs overlap with services described elsewhere on this site, including the Exchange Escrow Audit service, which focuses on dual-authorization controls and reconciliations for funds sitting with the intermediary, and the Qualified Intermediary Coordination service, which manages the day-to-day document flow between the intermediary, the closing attorney, and the lender. Understanding what the qualified intermediary role legally requires, separate from what any specific coordination service adds on top of that baseline, helps a Boston, MA investor evaluate whether a given provider or add-on service is filling a genuine gap or simply duplicating work the intermediary is already obligated to perform under the exchange agreement.
Common replacement classes
Educational walkthrough of qualified intermediary selection criteria and fund-holding structures for a first-time exchange investor
Client Situation
A Boston, MA investor preparing for a first exchange was unsure how to evaluate different qualified intermediary providers or what questions to ask about fund security
Our Approach
We explained the disqualification rules, walked through the difference between qualified escrow and qualified trust account structures, and outlined the due diligence questions to raise with prospective providers given the absence of state licensing in Massachusetts
The investor selected a qualified intermediary with a documented fidelity bond and segregated escrow structure and understood the exchange agreement before signing
A qualified intermediary is required under the safe harbor rules in the Treasury Regulations because a taxpayer who directly receives sale proceeds from the relinquished property is treated as being in actual or constructive receipt of those funds, which disqualifies the exchange. For an investor in Boston, MA, using a qualified intermediary to receive and hold the funds outside the taxpayer's control is what allows the delayed exchange structure to satisfy federal tax requirements.
Generally not, if that attorney has represented the taxpayer in a legal capacity within the two years before the exchange, because the Treasury Regulations disqualify an attorney, accountant, or other agent who has acted for the taxpayer in that period. Most investors in Boston, MA instead engage a separate, dedicated qualified intermediary company that has no prior agency relationship with the taxpayer.
Massachusetts does not maintain a state-specific licensing or bonding requirement for qualified intermediaries, unlike some other states that have adopted such statutes. Because of this, investors in Boston, MA generally need to perform their own due diligence on a prospective qualified intermediary, including confirming how funds are held, whether a fidelity bond and errors and omissions insurance are in place, and whether exchange funds are held in a segregated qualified escrow or qualified trust account.
Exchange funds are typically held in a qualified escrow account or qualified trust account structured so the taxpayer cannot demand release of the funds except in narrow circumstances defined by the exchange agreement, such as after the forty-five-day identification period ends without a valid identification, or after the one hundred eighty-day exchange period closes. The taxpayer generally directs how and when funds are released toward a replacement property purchase, but does not have direct access to the account.
Yes. In a reverse exchange, an affiliated exchange accommodation titleholder, working alongside the qualified intermediary, may take and hold title to either the replacement property or the relinquished property under the safe harbor established in Revenue Procedure 2000-37, since one leg of the transaction has to close before the other in a reverse structure. This is a more involved role than the intermediary plays in a standard delayed exchange.

Ready to Begin?
Share your timelines and acquisition targets and we will deliver a prioritized property roadmap for your identification window.
Start Your Briefing