
Guides
Step 1
Engage
Step 2
Identify
Step 3
Close
Triple Net Retail
Example inventory only. We provide introductions to licensed brokers.
Logistics and Industrial
Active sourcing channel
Medical and Life Science
Active sourcing channel
Office and Lab Conversions
Active sourcing channel
Multifamily and Mixed-Use
Active sourcing channel
Hospitality and Leisure
Active sourcing channel
A reverse 1031 exchange flips the usual order of a like-kind exchange. In a standard delayed exchange, the relinquished property sells first and the replacement property is acquired afterward, inside the forty-five and one hundred eighty-day windows. In a reverse exchange, the replacement property is acquired first, before the relinquished property has sold. This structure is useful when a strong replacement candidate becomes available and cannot realistically wait for the relinquished property sale to close, which happens often in competitive markets across Greater Boston where well-priced multifamily, retail, and industrial assets can move quickly once they are listed.
The mechanical challenge with a reverse exchange is that the taxpayer cannot hold title to both the relinquished property and the replacement property at the same time while still treating the transaction as a single exchange, because there is no mechanism under Section 1031 itself for a taxpayer to exchange property they already own for property they are about to acquire while both are simultaneously in the taxpayer's own name. The Internal Revenue Service addressed this gap in Revenue Procedure 2000-37, which created a safe harbor structure built around a party called the exchange accommodation titleholder, often shortened to EAT.
Under the safe harbor, the exchange accommodation titleholder, typically an entity affiliated with the qualified intermediary, takes and holds legal title to one of the two properties for the duration of the reverse exchange. In the more common exchange-first variation, the exchange accommodation titleholder takes title to the replacement property while the taxpayer arranges to sell the relinquished property. Once the relinquished property sells, the qualified intermediary structure completes the exchange and title to the replacement property transfers from the exchange accommodation titleholder to the taxpayer. In the less common exchange-last variation, the exchange accommodation titleholder instead takes title to the relinquished property while the taxpayer acquires the replacement property directly, and the relinquished property is sold out of the exchange accommodation titleholder's name afterward.
This arrangement is documented through a qualified exchange accommodation arrangement, or QEAA, which is a written agreement establishing that the exchange accommodation titleholder is holding title for tax purposes on behalf of the exchange rather than as the true economic owner. The safe harbor requires that the property be identified as either replacement or relinquished property within five business days of the exchange accommodation titleholder taking title, and it imposes the same overall one hundred eighty-day limit on how long the exchange accommodation titleholder can hold title before both legs of the transaction must be completed.
Because the replacement property is typically acquired using financing or funds the taxpayer arranges outside the exchange proceeds, which have not yet been generated by the relinquished property sale, reverse exchanges often require either substantial available cash or a lender willing to finance a property that is technically titled to the exchange accommodation titleholder rather than directly to the taxpayer during the interim period. This financing complexity, combined with the added legal and administrative cost of establishing the exchange accommodation titleholder entity, generally makes a reverse exchange a more involved undertaking than a standard delayed exchange. For Boston, MA investors weighing whether a reverse structure is worth pursuing on a specific opportunity, coordinating early with a qualified intermediary experienced in reverse transactions, along with a lender familiar with exchange accommodation titleholder financing, is typically the difference between a smooth transaction and one that stalls on structuring details.
It is worth noting that Revenue Procedure 2000-37 describes a safe harbor, not the only legally permissible way to structure a reverse exchange. Taxpayers and their advisors have, on occasion, structured reverse exchanges outside the safe harbor's specific parameters, relying instead on general tax principles to support the intended treatment. Because those non-safe-harbor structures do not benefit from the same presumption of validity, and because the case law supporting them is comparatively thin, the overwhelming majority of reverse exchanges completed today, including those involving Boston, MA investors, are structured to fit squarely within the safe harbor's requirements, such as the five-business-day identification window and the overall one hundred eighty-day holding limit, specifically to avoid relying on a more uncertain legal position. The qualified exchange accommodation arrangement agreement itself should be drafted by counsel experienced with these transactions, since the specific representations and covenants in that agreement are what establish the exchange accommodation titleholder's role for tax purposes.
Insurance and liability considerations also deserve attention during the period the exchange accommodation titleholder holds title. Because the exchange accommodation titleholder is the legal owner of record, property insurance, liability coverage, and, for a leased property, landlord obligations under existing tenant leases typically need to be structured in the exchange accommodation titleholder's name during the interim period, even though the taxpayer is the party economically responsible for the property and directing all substantive decisions. Coordinating this handoff with an insurance broker familiar with reverse exchange structures, so coverage does not lapse or leave a gap in named-insured status, is a detail that is easy to overlook amid the larger legal and financing questions a reverse exchange raises for a Boston, MA investor.
This site's Reverse Exchange Blueprint service picks up where this explainer leaves off, walking a specific transaction through the exchange accommodation titleholder paperwork, coordinating with the qualified intermediary on the qualified exchange accommodation arrangement, and managing the five-business-day identification window in real time. Reading this explainer first is generally the right starting point, since understanding why the exchange accommodation titleholder structure exists, rather than just following a checklist, makes it easier for a Boston, MA investor to ask informed questions of the qualified intermediary, the lender, and legal counsel as a specific reverse transaction moves forward.
Common replacement classes
A reverse exchange is used when a strong replacement property becomes available before the relinquished property has sold, which is common in competitive Greater Boston submarkets where well-priced assets move quickly. Rather than losing the opportunity while waiting for the relinquished property sale to close, the investor can acquire the replacement property first through the exchange accommodation titleholder safe harbor.
An exchange accommodation titleholder, often shortened to EAT, is typically an entity affiliated with the qualified intermediary that takes and holds legal title to either the replacement property or the relinquished property under the safe harbor established in Revenue Procedure 2000-37. This structure allows the reverse exchange to proceed without the taxpayer holding both properties simultaneously in their own name.
The safe harbor described in Revenue Procedure 2000-37 imposes an overall one hundred eighty-day limit on how long the exchange accommodation titleholder can hold title, similar to the one hundred eighty-day period in a standard delayed exchange. Within that period, the property must also be identified as replacement or relinquished property within five business days of the exchange accommodation titleholder taking title.
Generally yes. A reverse exchange typically involves additional legal and administrative costs associated with establishing the exchange accommodation titleholder entity, along with financing considerations, since the replacement property may need to be acquired using funds or financing arranged outside the exchange proceeds. Investors in Boston, MA should budget for these added costs when comparing a reverse structure against waiting to complete a standard delayed exchange.
Financing is possible but requires a lender familiar with exchange accommodation titleholder structures, since the property is technically titled to the EAT rather than directly to the taxpayer during the interim period. Coordinating with both the qualified intermediary and a lender experienced in reverse exchange financing early in the process is important for Boston, MA investors considering this structure.

Ready to Begin?
Share your timelines and acquisition targets and we will deliver a prioritized property roadmap for your identification window.
Start Your Briefing